Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-sigs] [Emerging-Sigs] For Instance: Hostile FTP Sigs |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:41:28 -0500 |
Brian Caswell wrote:
Why write 9 extra rules when a tag on this 1 rule will accomplish the same thing and provide even more "useful" data.
Accuracy and load were my thoughts. Since it's 1024: for ports I want to make sure that the minimum matching is being done on all that traffic. It's quite conceivable that benign traffic on high ports could start with a 220. This way we have a nearly foolproof chain of events before we get a hit. No falses in theory... and low load. Matt -- -------------------------------------------- Matthew Jonkman Emerging Threats US Phone 765-429-0398 US Fax 312-264-0205 AUS Fax 61-29-4750-026 http://www.emergingthreats.net -------------------------------------------- PGP: http://www.jonkmans.com/mattjonkman.asc ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] For Instance: Hostile FTP Sigs, Brian Caswell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] [Emerging-Sigs] For Instance: Hostile FTP Sigs, Jason Brvenik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] For Instance: Hostile FTP Sigs, Brian Caswell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] [Emerging-Sigs] For Instance: Hostile FTP Sigs, Jason Brvenik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |