Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Confused by 'IMAP SSLv3 Server_Hello request'? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 31 Dec 2007 07:54:51 -0500 |
On Dec 31, 2007, at 2007/12/31 3:45 AM, Sun wrote:
I'm confused by the signature and description about the alert: 'IMAP SSLv3 Server_Hello request'. The rule of this alert is as follows: alert tcp $HOME_NET 993 -> $EXTERNAL_NET any (msg:"IMAP SSLv3 Server_Hello request"; flow:to_client,established; flowbits:isset,sslv3.client_hello.request; content:"|16 03 00|"; depth:3; content:"|02|"; depth:1; offset:5; flowbits:set,sslv3.server_hello.request; flowbits:noalert; metadata:service imap; classtype:protocol-command-decode; sid:2530; rev:8;) I learn following things from this rule: 1) the srcipaddress of this alert is a sslv3 server; 2) the server are sending a message to a client in the external net; 3) from the flow: to_client, I guess that the alert is an attack to the client, rather than a response to an attack from the client; However, the description of this alert says that the alert may indicate that a DoS attack to the sslv3 server. So I'm confused by these situations.
Because of the "flowbits:noalert", you should never see an alert with this rule. This rule is used for tracking SSL connection state for other meaningful rules and has no useful meaning by itself. Are you sure this rule is generating an alert? Brian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Snort-sigs] Confused by 'IMAP SSLv3 Server_Hello request'?, Sun |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Emerging Threats Daily Signature Changes, Matt Jonkman |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-sigs] Confused by 'IMAP SSLv3 Server_Hello request'?, Sun |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-sigs] For Instance: Hostile FTP Sigs, Matt Jonkman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |