Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Snort-Signatures
[Top] [All Lists]

[Snort-users] New revs? of old sigs causing Snort to die

Subject: [Snort-users] New revs? of old sigs causing Snort to die
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:31:24 -0400
Starting Friday I noticed the following problems with the following signatures.

The following rules start with 'alert udp' and contain flow: statements.

634,635,636,637,2004

I'm using Snort 2.7.0.1 on RHEL4 and it's complaining and refusing to
run until these rules are commented out.

Also, the following rules are using a comma-delimited list of ports,
which is causing Snort to barf:

12635,12642

What's up?

PaulM

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>