Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Snort-sigs] rsync problem |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:35:07 +0100 |
Hi I have a problem with the rule: alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 873 (msg:"MISC rsyncd overflow attempt"; flow:to_server,established; byte_test:2,>,4000,0; content:"|00 00|"; depth:2; offset:2; reference:bugtraq,9153; reference:cve,2003-0962; reference:nessus,11943; classtype:misc-activity; sid:2048; rev:7;) The byte_test command "byte_test:2,>,4000,0" seems suspect to me. As far as I understand it, it says "compare the value of the first 2 bytes in the packet payload and see if it is greater than 4000". I don't think the value of 2 bytes will ever be more than 4000?? What is stranger is that nearly ALL my rsync traffic triggers on this rule!!! Here is a sample of a payload that triggers: ======================== length = 4 000 : A4 00 00 00 .... ======================== If we step through this rule we see that first 2 bytes are A4 which is not more than 4000! The rest of the rule is satisfied though... I am pretty new to the snort rule writing, so I am betting on a gap in my knowledge causing this missunderstanding but I just can't figgure it out! Thanks in advance for any help on this. Kind Regards Christiaan Ehlers Systems Administrator Inclarity plc * 7th Floor * Olympic Office Centre * 8 Fulton Road * Wembley * Middlesex * HA9 0NU Tel: +44 (0) 208 634 0445 Mob: +44 (0) 777 913 7962 Fax: +44 (0) 208 634 9145 Email: christiaan.ehlers@inclarity.co.uk Web: www.inclarity.co.uk <http://www.inclarity.co.uk/> Disclaimer ========================================== This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Inclarity Ltd. Registered Office: Olympic Office Centre, Fulton Road, Wembley, Middlesex, HA9 0NU Telephone: + 44 (0)845 698 0800 Fax: + 44 (0)845 698 1000 Registered Company No. 02673204 ==========================================
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] variable, Joseph Jenkins |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] rsync problem, Nigel Houghton |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-sigs] variable, Jules |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] rsync problem, Nigel Houghton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |