Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-sigs] nmap rules |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 5 Jul 2007 14:42:39 +0200 |
Le jeudi 5 juillet 2007 14:07, Lawrence Strydom a écrit :
the only entry in local.rules is: drop tcp any any -> any 80 (classtype:attempted-user; msg:"Port 80 connection initiated";) I used this to verify that snort is actually doing something. So when I try to connect to the web server on the snort box,the connection times out and I see the following output in the log: [**] [1:0:0] Port 80 connection initiated [**] [Classification: Attempted User Privilege Gain] [Priority: 1] 07/05-15:47:41.917831 192.168.2.18:59375 -> 192.168.2.105:80 TCP TTL:59 TOS:0x0 ID:3429 IpLen:20 DgmLen:44 ******S* Seq: 0x199A99FC Ack: 0x0 Win: 0x1000 TcpLen: 24 TCP Options (1) => MSS: 1460
Hi I don't know exactly why. I assume that the functions used to follow the tcp stream are not adapted to this scan. Perhaps it is necessary to go further the SYN-SYN/ACK. My question is : if you don't want any connection on the port 80, why don't you just put an iptables rule on your box ? It seems a more efficient way to obtain the same result.
SO I know snort is working but when I run an nmap scan against the snort box, there is nothing in the log and the scan succeeds. I have tried both nmap -sT and nmap -sS. Both go undetected. SO now the question is, where can I find a good rule set that will detect these kind of scans and drop all packets from the attacking host? Thanks Lawrence
-- Thierry CHICH Rectorat de Clermont-Ferrand ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Snort-sigs] unsubscribe, Marty . Bostick |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-sigs] Bleeding Edge Threats Daily Signature Changes, bleeding |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-sigs] nmap rules, Lawrence Strydom |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] nmap rules, Jason Brvenik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |