Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-sigs] new rule for detect windows NAT DNS DoS |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:47:44 -0500 |
Yeah, checking the code I see the string match for byte_test with an example. There also seems to be a 10 byte limitation with string, as in, I should be using a content match. So 1,2,4 bytes for all. Really though, isn't this perfect for the DNS Preprocessor as it checks tcp and udp traffic on port 53? Or at least a shared object rule :-) Shirkdog http://www.shirkdog.us
From: Brian <bmc@snort.org> To: "M. Shirk" <shirkdog_list@hotmail.com> CC: Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net, rmkml@free.fr,bhartstein@demarc.com Subject: Re: [Snort-sigs] new rule for detect windows NAT DNS DoS Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:05:21 -0500 On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:22:08AM -0500, M. Shirk wrote:This is what I had. Its the Query, with the other values set to null. alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> any 53 (msg:"DNS Goes bad on Windows"; content:"|01 00|"; offset: 2; byte_test:8,=,0,0,relative; rev:1;sid:666; ) commentary: - using content where you should be using byte_test - using byte_test where you should be using content - even if byte_test was the correct rule option for the data it is being used to compare against (which it isn't), byte_test can only read up to 4 bytes of data. [0] Fixup suggestions: 1) Check the single bit with byte_test 2) Check the 8 bytes of null with content Brian 0 - string mode is different. but you are not using string mode, so don't worry about it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
_________________________________________________________________ Add a Yahoo! contact to Windows Live Messenger for a chance to win a free trip! http://www.imagine-windowslive.com/minisites/yahoo/default.aspx?locale=en-us&hmtagline ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Dynamic DNS update attempt (new sig), Brian |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Dynamic DNS update attempt (new sig), Jon Hart |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Dynamic DNS update attempt (new sig), Brian |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-sigs] Bleeding Edge Threats Daily Update, bleeding |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |