Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-sigs] confused over thresholds |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 03 Aug 2006 18:45:42 -0400 |
Russell Fulton wrote:
Hi Folk,
I clearly don't understand this properly, sigh...
I am getting lots (tens of thousands) of hits on the bleeding VNC rule:
:alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 5900:5920 (msg: "BLEEDING-EDGE
SCAN Potential VNC Scan 5900-5920"; flags:S; threshold: type threshold,
track by_src, count 50, seconds 900; classtype:attempted-recon;
sid:2002911; rev:1;)
Astute people will notice that I have raised both the count and the
seconds parameters to threshold in an attempt to cut down the number of
alerts.
My understanding is that I should get just one alert every 900 seconds
per source but instead I get:
No.. You'll get one alert for every 50 hosts scanned by the source in
a window of 900 seconds. (basically, whichever is greater. 47 hosts
scanned will emit one alert after 900 seconds. 100 hosts in 900 seconds
will emit two.)
If you only want one alert every 900 seconds, you might want to use a
"both" type threshold instead of a "threshold" type. rtfm, section 3.8.5.2 of
the 2.6.0 manual has a nice example.
--
Erik Fichtner; Unix Ronin
"Tyranny, whether it arises under threat of foreign physical attack
or under constant domestic authoritative scrutiny, is still tyranny.
Liberty requires security without intrusion--security plus privacy."
- Bruce Schneier
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] confused over thresholds, Jeff Kell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-sigs] Bleedingsnort.com Daily Update, bleeding |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] confused over thresholds, Jeff Kell |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-sigs] Snortalog, Edward J. Clarke |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |