Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Rule Set Completness |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 08 May 2006 17:16:45 -0400 |
Erik Fichtner wrote:
Gentoo-Wally wrote:1. Is the VRT set suppose to be a "complete" (for the lack of a better word. Maybe adequate would be better?) rule set capable of independent deployment. "Complete" meaning including rules for most known vulnerabilities/attacks or...No. Of the fuzzy "sorta" variety of no. It's complete in the sense that if it doesn't detect something and you're a paying customer of sourcefire, you can complain and alter that situation.
The rules set is complete in that it detects the things an intrusion system is typically concerned about. It is not in the sense that it detects everything you may be concerned about. The nature of Snort is such that people tend to abuse its capabilities for things that are not really related to intrusions. A perfect example is AV or policy violations... If you want high quality, tested rules backed by dedicated researchers, QA labs, and a full production test suite (Over 16 million units) for each release then the VRT set is the only way to go.
2. Would a "complete" or "more complete" set include the combination of VRT+Community+BleedingEdge Snort. If so...Yes.
Not at all. It would be a hodge podge of things that will confuse the general analyst and lead to a false sense of security. ( there is far more to that opinion than can be relayed here) The rules in the various sets out there should be combed for issues that you are concerned about and can personally validate.
3. Would the combination of VRT+Community+BleedingEdge result in a lot of duplicate signatures?Of course it would. Yes. see also: OSSRC Rules Overlap Committee.
------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Rule Set Completness, Erik Fichtner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-sigs] Snort v2.6.0 RC2 Available, Jennifer Steffens |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Rule Set Completness, Erik Fichtner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Rule Set Completness, Matt Jonkman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |