Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Sig 1147 |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:21:19 -0700 (PDT) |
Sorry my mod_security killed my message. Resending.... My point exactly but instead of not using the rule, which seems to be the default response when I ask a bout a rule, why not make it better so it traps only on the actual exploit. With my modded guardian script I can ignore idividual sids but then I still see the alerts in my BASE console and they still take up log and DB space. I guess I should of been more concise and asked if there was a way to get the rule updated. What is the process for doing that? It would also be helpful if someone could tell me if the rule syntax would acutally work. Thanks BP BassPlayer wrote:
Jamie Riden wrote:Hi BP, There are lots of other circumstances in which you don't want a 'cat' command, e.g. with the awstats exploit, people will use cat/echo/id to test if a script is vulnerable. Something like this: GET /cgi-bin/?configdir=%7cecho%20%3becho%20b_exp%3bcat%20%3a%etc%3apasswd%20e_exp%3b%2500 HTTP/1.1" However, the cat%20 rule does tend to generate a lot of false positives - for example at the vet department of the university I used to work at :) I wouldn't recommend blocking using it. cheers, Jamie On 26/04/06, BassPlayer <bassplayer@angmar.com> wrote:After checking the actual exploit here http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/374/exploit Wouln't it be better to do alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HTTP_SERVERS $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"WEB-MISC cat%20 access"; flow:to_server,established; (pcre:"/webdist.cgi.+cat%20/i";) nocase; reference:bugtraq,374; reference:cve,1999-0039; classtype:attempted-recon; sid:1147; rev:7;) Please excuse my n00bness in rules writing. BP BassPlayer wrote:Hi, Can this rule be tightened up a bit? alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HTTP_SERVERS $HTTP_PORTS(msg:"WEB-MISCcat%20 access"; flow:to_server,established; content:"cat%20"; nocase; reference:bugtraq,374; reference:cve,1999-0039;classtype:attempted-recon;sid:1147; rev:7;) It's triggering on the following request which is my wife streamingmusic.She wasn't too happy when my modified guardian script autoblocked her:D.BP Generated by BASE v1.2.2 (cindy) on Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:18:24 -0700 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ #(1 - 113755) [2006-04-25 07:35:06] [cve/1999-0039] [icat/1999-0039] [bugtraq/374] [local/1147] [snort/1147] WEB-MISC cat%20 access IPv4: 143.183.121.1 -> 209.237.15.226 hlen=5 TOS=0 dlen=517 ID=43136 flags=0 offset=0 TTL=47chksum=46826TCP: port=56372 -> dport: 80 flags=***AP*** seq=2968053703 ack=1992497194 off=8 res=0 win=5840 urp=0 chksum=57923 Options: #1 - NOP len=0 #2 - NOP len=0 #3 - TS len=8 data=A0754FBD005A583E Payload: GET /private_music_archive/play/index.php?song=2538&uid=usersid=sid&ds=32&name=/The%20Pussycat%20Dolls%20-%20Bite%20the%20Dust.mp3 HTTP/1.0 Accept: */* User-Agent: Windows-Media-Player/10.00.00.3990 Host: www.angmar.com Cookie: amp_longsess=1; POSTNUKESID=mumble Via: 1.0 scfwpr01.sc.intel.com:911 (squid/2.5.STABLE12) X-Forwarded-For: unknown Cache-Control: max-age=259200 Connection: keep-alive ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,security?Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make yourjobeasier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on ApacheGeronimohttp://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs-- Jamie Riden / jamesr@europe.com / jamie.riden@computer.org "Microsoft: Bringing the world to your desktop - and your desktop to the world." -- Peter Gutmann------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs !DSPAM:444edc89215666362979185!
------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Sig 1147, BassPlayer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Sig 1147, nnposter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Sig 1147, BassPlayer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Sig 1147, nnposter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |