Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-sigs] bleeding -> snort rules? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sat, 03 Dec 2005 12:38:40 -0600 |
On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 11:36 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote:
Yes, the above makes sense. It kind of bothers me that a significant number of bleeding rules have been around for a while (and are very good), but the naming convention (and process) essentially implies they are all still bleeding-edge.
heh... maybe we should drop the B then ;)
Based on previous postings relative to ossrc, the implication was that production quality rules would be moved from bleeding into some snort sort of open-source rule set (eg, community).
Yeah, I think one of the goals is to create a central repository where stable Community and stable Bleeding rules could be moved into and maintained by the OSSRC admins or assigned rule custodians. A lot of rules in the Community set could use improvements. I think finding a group of people willing to donate time to improve these rules is the current challenge. If no one volunteers to maintain/improve/tweak these, the chances of finding people to staff an OSSRC repository seem rather slim. I hope I'm not appearing as overly critical when I say that it might be the organizational structure of the OSSRC that may slow down the development of the planned projects (like a central OSSRC rule repository). These things just don't work well on a routine schedule with meetings and all. It takes dedicated people to step forward and pull the wagon fast and furious to gain momentum. Without these people, volunteer organizations typically slow to a crawl and wither (I've been, and still am, in several where I volunteer my time, so I see these things unfold first-hand). That's also the reason I have not been able to volunteer for the OSSRC as the time I can afford for non-profits has reached the max (I know, I know, I need to shoft more time towards Snortsam which has slowed down again.... argh!.. it's a juggling act). Anyway, what I'm saying is that people need to step forward and get actively involved and make things happen. I wouldn't wait for meetings to formalize things, I'd be rolling up my sleeves, pester OSSRC people for passwords to the OSSRC system and be setting up the rule repository, then coordinating import of rules. So if you, or anyone else, has time to spare, please get actively involved in the OSSRC. It's at a critical time right now where it needs to gain momentum. The service is for you guys, but it also depends on you to function. It takes some effort to get this thing started, but once running will provide you with valueable services in return. It just takes people to step forward and start pulling the wagon. Cheers, Frank -- It is said that the Internet is a public utility. As such, it is best compared to a sewer. A big, fat pipe with a bunch of crap sloshing against your ports.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] bleeding -> snort rules?, Rich Adamson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-sigs] Bleedingsnort.com Daily Update, bleeding |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] bleeding -> snort rules?, Rich Adamson |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-sigs] new rule for detect ntpd fingerprint, rmkml |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |