Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Snort-Signatures
[Top] [All Lists]

[Snort-sigs] possible fix for FPs for EXPLOIT CDE dtspcd exploit attem

Subject: [Snort-sigs] possible fix for FPs for EXPLOIT CDE dtspcd exploit attempt sid:1398
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:39:04 +1300


Russell Fulton wrote:
I have recently (last week or so) been seeing hits on this rule -- it
would appear that something other than dtspcd is now using tcp 6112.


most likely candidate is World of Warcraft game that also uses tcp-6112.

I've found a packet dump of a real exploit and you need several 100
chars of NOPs so I propose adding isdata:500 to this sig that will stop
it triggering on the short packets used by the game.  I suspect this sig
 predates isdata or it would have been used.

Is there any interest in updating the rule?

Russell


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course
Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005
Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information
_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>