Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Matching question |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 19 Jul 2005 08:17:00 -0500 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Does "distance" mean absolute relative distance? The reason I had depth: 0 is because the FF 51 is at the start of the packet. Here are a couple examples of packets (I'm going to mix hex and ascii where it's easier: "|FF 51 09 00 01 00 00 00 00|" "|FF 51 11 00 01 00 00 00|error text|00|" The packets are in the form: FF 51 packet size (2 bytes, little endian) status code (4 bytes, little endian) error string (null terminated string) What I want to detect is that the packet starts with |FF 51|, I don't care about the size, I want to detect a certain error code (|01 00 00 00|), and I don't care about the error text. Will depth:0 and distance:1 accomplish that uniquely? Thanks Ron Jason Brvenik wrote:
you are a little off in the depth area. content:"|FF 51|"; content:"|00 01 02 00 00|"; distance:1 is more likely what you want. are there any other unique bits? can you send a sample pkt with some background Ron wrote: I have a pretty simple question, with hopefully a simple answer. I'd like to match a packet that looks like this: |FF 51 xx 00 01 02 00 00 ...| That is, starting with FF 51, then any byte, then 00 01 02 00 00, then any other number of bytes. This is what I have now: content:"|FF 51|"; depth:0; content:"|00 01 02 00 00|" But that's going to hit some false positives. Any ideas?
- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC3P1MfqSf2EkP4p4RAmCQAJ94bng864OfNNMqUfr63N14u6PDjwCfT1LZ yrSpimuFQQfE7Uumg7cWBP8= =YnbI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Matching question, Jason Brvenik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Matching question, bmc |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Matching question, Jason Brvenik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Matching question, bmc |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |