Network Security: Detailed info on Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig

Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.

Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.

Network Security Snort-Signatures

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig

from [Russell Fulton] Network Security

[Permanent Link]

Subject:	Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig
Date:	Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:50:47 +1200

bmc@snort.org wrote:

Heh.  Did you put "near perfect" in the message to get me to pipe up?

Whats wrong with using sfportscan to detect this scan?  This "near
perfect" rule implements a crude network scan detection at a fairly
hefty cost to performance.


not everyone runs sfportscan, or wants too.  Simple minded portscanners get 
far to many FPs to be useful in our environment.  Rules like this allow us to 
focus on one very specific problem.


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, (continued) Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, Matt Jonkman Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, Paul Schmehl Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, Wes Young Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, Matt Jonkman Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, Erik Fichtner Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, Paul Schmehl Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, Michael Sierchio Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, Paul Schmehl Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, bmc Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, Matt Jonkman Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, Russell Fulton <= Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, bmc Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, Frank Knobbe Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, bmc Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, Matt Jonkman Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, Nigel Houghton Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, Matt Jonkman Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, Jeff Kell Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, Paul Schmehl Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, Jason Haar Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, James Riden

Previous by Date:	[Snort-sigs] Bleedingsnort.com Daily Update, bleeding
Next by Date:	Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, bmc
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, Matt Jonkman
Next by Thread:	Re: [Snort-sigs] SSH brute force attack sig, bmc
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]