Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Snort-Signatures
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Snort-sigs] Possible FP for rules 2329, precision

from [Russell Fulton] Network Security [Permanent Link]
Subject: Re: [Snort-sigs] Possible FP for rules 2329, precision
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 19:14:43 +1200 
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 08:12 +0200, Guillaume Arcas wrote:

I correct my previous post about false positive against VPN traffic :

I think that it is due to the rule having 'any' for port destination and
not 1434/1433 usual MS-SQL UDP ports.


Presumably this was done deliberately to enable the rule to catch
attacks against servers running on non standard ports.  Posting a pcap
of the packet that caused the FP may enable the sig maintainers to
refine the rule so it does not FP.

Russell

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

[More with this subject...]




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [Snort-sigs] Possible FP for rules 2329, precision, Guillaume Arcas
Next by Date:  [Snort-sigs] Sourcefire VRT Certified Rules Update, Matthew Watchinski
Previous by Thread:  [Snort-sigs] Possible FP for rules 2329, precision, Guillaume Arcas
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]