Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Possible improvements to pop3 rules. |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 04 May 2005 09:52:16 -0400 |
Frank Knobbe wrote:
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 08:04 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:56:59PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:Here we have a search of the string "USER" followed by the given PCRE search. However, the PCRE is anchored to the start of the packet.Hmm. That's bogus. There's no reason that the USER has to be at the start of the packet.
Heh... actually, I think I have to agree. The USER has to be at the beginning on the line, but that doesn't have to be the beginning of the _stream_.
OK, so then it's anchored by ^ or \r\n then, with a \s afterwards. Jeff ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Possible improvements to pop3 rules., Frank Knobbe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Possible improvements to pop3 rules., Brian |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Possible improvements to pop3 rules., Frank Knobbe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Possible improvements to pop3 rules., Brian |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |