Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Snort-sigs] Bad tag directive in bleeding snort rule? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 4 May 2005 09:36:54 +1000 |
Hi all,
Bleeding snort rule with sid 2001879 (Joe Stewart) contains:
tag : 200 ;
and I'm not too sure what this does.
The tag directive is listed in the documentation as:
3.7.5 tag
The tag keyword allow rules to log more than just the single packet
that triggered the rule. Once a rule is triggered, additional traffic
involving the source and/or destination host is tagged. Tagged
traffic is logged to allow analysis of response codes and post-attack
traffic. tagged alerts will be sent to the same output plugins as the
original alert, but it is the responsibility of the output plugin to
properly handle these special alerts. Currently, the database output
plugin, described in Section 2.5.6, does not properly handle tagged
alerts.
Format
tag: <type>, <count>, <metric>, [direction]
Which seems to imply that tag requires either three or four parameters.
This looks like another instance of the snort rule parser being overly
permissive in what it accepts.
Anyone have any light to shine on this?
Cheers,
Erik
--
-------------------------------------------------------
[N] Erik de Castro Lopo, Senior Computer Engineer
[E] erik.de.castro.lopo@sensorynetworks.com
[W] http://www.sensorynetworks.com
[T] +61 2 83022726
[F] +61 2 94750316
[A] L6/140 William St, East Sydney NSW 2011, Australia
-------------------------------------------------------
A good debugger is no substitute for a good test suite.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Snort-sigs] Two more bleeding snort rules with bad escape sequences., Erik de Castro Lopo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Two more bleeding snort rules with bad escape sequences., Frank Knobbe |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-sigs] Two more bleeding snort rules with bad escape sequences., Erik de Castro Lopo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Bad tag directive in bleeding snort rule?, Frank Knobbe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |