Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-sigs] ipadnet.com.br's broken mailservers. |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 05 Apr 2005 20:23:56 -0400 |
Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
Will the mailinglist admin be kind enough to remove the address that is resulting in these bounces? I have asked it outside the list several times but apparantly NO ONE is listening.
They've been doing that for many months, possibly years now. Unfortunately nobody can tell what the offending address is, since ipadnet.br doesn't include the offending account name in their bounces. The fact that they send the bounce to you, and not the list's Return-Path: header is a RFC violation, and a dangerous one at that. It appears their server breaks because they ignore the envelope recipient and instead try to deliver snort-sigs as a local user. That fails, as will all list postings or Bcc's from anywhere in the world. Since it fails, and their mail system ignores envelopes, they decide to also ignore the Return-Path and send the bounce back to the From: header address... Also, in generating this error, they decide to ignore the requirement of using a null return path (used to prevent bounces from bouncing) and instead use postmaster as a return path. That's 3 errors in handling a very common kind of message. Brilliant! Ignoring the Return-Path inhibits the list's ability to automatically handle broken mail accounts, and their generic message is completely useless to anyone trying to fix the problem. Using a non-null return-path creates a hazard of potential mail loops. As a matter of defending your network from a dangerously misconfigured server I recommend blacklisting their MTA. Given that their server fails to handle messages with a envelope recipient that differs from the To: line, fails to properly generate error messages, and has failed to get fixed for an extended period of time it's probably best that you treat the entire network as a danger to itself and others. If you don't want to hammer the whole domain, at the very least you can block all their dangerous bounce messages with one access entry: postmaster@ipadnet.com.br 550 mail systems with broken bounces are not welcome here ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Snort-sigs] VRT Certified Rules Update, Matthew Watchinski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-sigs] Bleedingsnort.com Daily Update, bleeding |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-sigs] Problemas com o e-mail (fwd), Hugo van der Kooij |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] ipadnet.com.br's broken mailservers., Hugo van der Kooij |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |