Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Snort-Signatures
[Top] [All Lists]

[Snort-sigs] A doubt about snort sid 1932

Subject: [Snort-sigs] A doubt about snort sid 1932
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 09:59:48 +0800

I found that the snort rule 1932 describes :

alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HTTP_SERVERS $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"WEB-CGI rpc-smb.pl access"; flow:to_server,established; uricontent:"/rpc-smb.pl"; reference:cve,1999-1278; classtype:web-application-activity; sid:1932; rev:3;)

But after I searched the detail of rpc-smb.pl,I found nothing relevant to it.And in cve:1999-1278 which referrs to this rule,it gives another name nlog-smb.pl.

So,I what to know is this rule right,Anyone can help?


------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Snort-sigs] A doubt about snort sid 1932, Wang Hui <=