Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: [Snort-sigs] First attempt at writing a sig |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:21:22 -0600 |
Thanks for pointing that out here's the updated rule alert udp any any -> any any (msg:"Netop Remote Control Usage"; content:"|554b30303736305337473130|"; reference:url,www.netop.com; classtype:policy-violation; sid:2000000; rev:2;) This caught my traffic going to my remote subnets. I tried increasing the revision # as well but to no avail so I changed the sid to 2000001 alert udp any any -> any any (msg:"Netop Remote Control Usage"; content:"|554b30303736305337473130|"; reference:url,www.netop.com; classtype:policy-violation; sid:2000001; rev:1;) Now it's showing up in Acid correctly -----Original Message----- From: Matt Jonkman [mailto:matt@infotex.com] Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 2:10 PM To: Lance Boon Cc: snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Snort-sigs] First attempt at writing a sig Not a bad run for a first sig. Thanks for posting it. Why did you go home-home net? Why not home-any? Or even any-any? I'm not that familiar with the tool, but I'd think the most interesting traffic would be someone from the outside connecting to a local box. As far as why it doesn't show right in acid, not sure. It is crafted correctly. Try increasing the rev number and hitting it again. I wonder if maybe the first time you had a hit the msg was empty, in which case it won't take the new msg until the rev # increases. I'll put this up on bleeding snort for more testing after we sort out the reasons for the home-home. Matt Lance Boon wrote:
This is my first attempt at writing a sig and wondered if anybody had any pointers. I got a pcap of a netop session to 2 different systems, ran it through snort and noticed that the content was the same on in
one
particular packet. So I wrote a rule for it, I have this working on my network right now and haven't had any false positives yet. The only thing that is bugging me and I'm sure that it's something that I'm missing is that when an alert hits it doesn't read "Netop Remote
Control
Usage" on the acid page it just says [snort] Snort Alert [1:2000000:0] alert udp $HOME_NET any -> $HOME_NET any (msg:"Netop Remote Control Usage"; content:"|554b30303736305337473130|"; reference:url,www.netop.com; classtype:policy-violation; sid:2000000; rev:1)
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Snort-sigs] First attempt at writing a sig, Hogan, Adam (A.W.) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] First attempt at writing a sig, Matt Jonkman |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Snort-sigs] First attempt at writing a sig, Hogan, Adam (A.W.) |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] First attempt at writing a sig, Matt Jonkman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |