Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-sigs] TCP sweeps |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:14:22 +1300 |
"Matt Jonkman" <mjonkman@infotex.com> writes:
We just recently had a similar discussion on the Bleedingsnort site. http://www.bleedingsnort.com/forum/viewtopic.php?forum=3&showtopic=363 We decided in local testing these rules would be of significant value, but they're not something we can have turned on in a default ruleset. It would have to be left to each local admin to make the decision which rules are good for their net, and more specifically what sensors they'd be able to run which on. I will make us the rules for this, but they'll be disabled by default in the bleeding rules. You'll have to specifically decide locally where they should go. I'll have this posted in just a few minutes. The rules going up are:
[snip rules for ports 135,137,139,445,1433,1434]
Any suggestions on other ports to watch in this manner?
http://www.nitroguard.com/rxbot.html RXBOT has the ability to scan for hosts that are affected by the following vulnerabilities: * MS04-011 Microsoft LSASS Buffer Overrun * MS03-026 Microsoft Buffer Overrun in RPC * MS03-007 Microsoft Unchecked Buffer in WebDAV * MS03-001 Microsoft Unchecked Buffer in RPC * MS01-059 Microsoft Unchecked Buffer in Universal Plug and Play Off the top of my head, I think WebDAV would be 80/tcp and UPnP is 5001/udp ? Talking of RxBot, anyone want to check these over and maybe add them in to bleeding.rules? alert tcp $HOME_NET !21:443 -> $EXTERNAL_NET !80 (msg:"BLEEDING-EDGE IRC Trojan Reporting (mssql)"; content:"PRIVMSG"; nocase; content:"mssql"; nocase; within:80; tag:session, 20, packets; classtype:trojan-activity; flow:to_server,established; sid:???????; rev:1;) alert tcp $HOME_NET !21:443 -> $EXTERNAL_NET !80 (msg:"BLEEDING-EDGE IRC Trojan Reporting (file transfer)"; content:"PRIVMSG"; nocase; content:"File transfer complete to IP"; nocase; within:80; tag:session, 20, packets; classtype:trojan-activity; flow:to_server,established; sid:???????; rev:1;) Example of second (first is just a different scan type on existing rule). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ #(1 - 104014) [2004-12-14 12:33:07.596] [snort/1] Tagged Packet IPv4: 130.123.xx.yy -> 129.78.ccc.dd hlen=5 TOS=0 dlen=145 ID=17069 flags=0 offset=0 TTL=128 chksum=63114 TCP: port=1101 -> dport: 37337 flags=***AP*** seq=121578580 ack=3313702052 off=5 res=0 win=15815 urp=0 chksum=38868 Payload: length = 105 000 : 50 52 49 56 4D 53 47 20 23 21 75 72 78 2D 65 78 PRIVMSG #!urx-ex 010 : 20 3A 5B 46 54 50 5D 3A 20 46 69 6C 65 20 74 72 :[FTP]: File tr 020 : 61 6E 73 66 65 72 20 63 6F 6D 70 6C 65 74 65 20 ansfer complete 030 : 74 6F 20 49 50 3A 20 31 33 30 2E 31 32 33 2E aa to IP: 130.123.a 040 : aa 2E bb bb bb 20 28 43 3A 5C 57 49 4E 4E 54 5C a.bbb (C:\WINNT\ 050 : 53 79 73 74 65 6D 33 32 5C 45 78 70 6C 6F 72 65 System32\Explore 060 : 72 2E 65 78 65 29 2E 0D 0A r.exe)... cheers, Jamie -- James Riden / j.riden@massey.ac.nz / Systems Security Engineer Information Technology Services, Massey University, NZ. GPG public key available at: http://www.massey.ac.nz/~jriden/ ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Snort-sigs] TCP sweeps, Matt Jonkman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-sigs] False +ves for SID 2657 :EXPLOIT SSLv2 Client_Hello with pad Challenge Length overflow attempt, Russell Fulton |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Snort-sigs] TCP sweeps, Matt Jonkman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] TCP sweeps, Matt Jonkman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |