Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-sigs] TCP sweeps |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:31:55 -0500 |
Good to know this idea has some value, thanks.
Matt
Hazel, Scott A. wrote:
We have dealt with similar issues here using Dragon. I know the platform is
different but we applied the same approach. I called them spike alerts and
started closer to 500 in 60 seconds. For segments containing MS DC's,
setting it as low as 50 still gave us a high FP rate. Seems like non-DC
segments would be fine at 50/min.
Scott Hazel
Security Operations Center
Unisys
scott.hazel@unisys.com
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Snort-sigs] TCP sweeps, Hazel, Scott A. |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Snort-sigs] TCP sweeps, Hazel, Scott A. |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Snort-sigs] TCP sweeps, Hazel, Scott A. |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Snort-sigs] TCP sweeps, Frank Knobbe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |