Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Reducing FPs by linking attacks to service versions |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sat, 04 Dec 2004 10:01:00 -0500 |
root wrote:
I think that's a great idea. The snag may be making sure your research is good on some of the sigs, and being certain that it affects only a certain version.I have just been playing with flowbits, and am wondering if there would be adverse effects to linking rules to specific service version where applicable.
Very good idea.
Matt
Simple example
alert tcp $HTTP_SERVERS $HTTP_PORTS -> any any \ (msg:"IS IIS4"; sid:2000000; \ rev:0; classtype:not-suspicious; \ content: "Server\: Microsoft-IIS\/4.0"; \ flowbits: set,isiis4; \ flowbits: noalert;)
Alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HTTP_SERVERS $HTTP_PORTS \
(msg:"New IIS4 fpcount attempt"; \
sid:2000002; rev:0; classtype:web-application-attack; \
flow:to_server,established; \ uricontent:"/fpcount.exe"; \
content:"Digits="; nocase; reference:bugtraq,2252; reference:cve,1999-1376; \
flowbits: isset,isiis4;)
How much of a resource hit would there be on a system to track connections in this way?
-N
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Snort-sigs] Bleedingsnort.com Daily Update, bleeding |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Suggestions for new attack response rules, Brian caswell |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-sigs] Reducing FPs by linking attacks to service versions, root |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-sigs] false positive snort it 2329 ?, dara |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |