Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Snort-sigs] Substitute for removed MS04-028 exploiting jpeg rule? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:51:44 +0100 (CET) |
Hi,
Has anyone a working rule for that gdi exploit? I've seen that the two rules once on bleedingsnort have been removed (good thing as they produced tons of false positives). Yet I failed to see any alternative. Any idea how the virus scanners find those jpegs without too much false positives?
Cheers,
Chris Kronberg.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Snort-sigs] Bleedingsnort.com Daily Update, bleeding |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Substitute for removed MS04-028 exploiting jpeg rule?, Alex Kirk |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-sigs] Strange behavior with http_inspect_server, Joe Patterson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Substitute for removed MS04-028 exploiting jpeg rule?, Matt Jonkman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |