Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: [Snort-sigs] Multiple content requirements in single rule, force order requirement |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:48:45 -0500 |
Alex, Thank you for the quick response. I should have been a little more specific. The 2 content matches will usually be separated by a non-standard number of other information. So the distance between the 2 will not always be the same. For example (still using A and B as the 2 separate content requirements in the example below (all other characters are for example purposes only and represent any info in potential payload)) ssdfvsdfAsdfghsdkfghlksjdfgkjfg sfdkjghskldfhgksjfdg Bsdfasdf Yet the rule is currently get triggered if either ssdfvsdfAsdfghsdkfghlksjdfgkjfg sfdkjghskldfhgksjfdg Bsdfasdf Or ssdfvsdfBsdfghsdkfghlksjdfgkjfg sfdkjghskldfhgksjfdg Asdfasdf Is seen and I would like it to only catch ssdfvsdfAsdfghsdkfghlksjdfgkjfg sfdkjghskldfhgksjfdg Bsdfasdf Make sense? Sorry for not be specific enough in my first example. It must have been too late for me to be up, lol. Any ideas? Scott Gould, MCP Senior Network & Systems Analyst Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical & Data Center sgould@gogstats.org 716-845-5702 -----Original Message----- From: Alex Kirk [mailto:alex.kirk@sourcefire.com] Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 8:54 AM To: Gould, Scott Cc: snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Snort-sigs] Multiple content requirements in single rule, force order requirement Scott, If you use distance:0 as a modifier to your second content, you'll get the desired effect here. Example: content:"A"; content:"B"; distance:0; This works because specifying a distance implies that you're looking for some criterion that comes after another one; the value of zero lets you start immediately after your first match. Alex Kirk Research Analyst Sourcefire, Inc.
I have a rule that has 2 different content requirements. I would like to be able to have the rule require that one of the content matches must be before the other, in order for the rule to be triggered. Overly simplified example: content: "A"; content: "B"; I want the rule to only match on AB not on BA. Make sense? I can't seem to find anything in the snort rule docs under
the content section. Any advice? Thanks in advance, Scott ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8 _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8 _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Multiple content requirements in single rule, force order requirement, Alex Kirk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-sigs] what triggers spp_stream4: TTL Evasion attempt, Russell Fulton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Multiple content requirements in single rule, force order requirement, Alex Kirk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Multiple content requirements in single rule, force order requirement, Jason |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |