Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Snort signatures for PBX |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:15:38 -0500 |
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 07:23, Teicher, Mark wrote:
Has anyone developed signatures for IP-based PBXs??
Yo Mark, how are things going? Regarding PBXes, what concerns do you have? Are you thinking about attack signatures against the respective Unix system (mostly SCO from what I've seen), or are you concerned about attacks against VoIP and other IP-based telephony protocols? Cheers, Frank
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Snort signatures for PBX, Matt Jonkman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-sigs] Bleedingsnort.com Daily Update, matt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Snort signatures for PBX, Matt Jonkman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] new Q signature, Kirby Angell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |