Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Snort-sigs] Rules utilisation |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:14:16 +0200 |
Hello,
There is something that I don't understand. I was believing that the bleeding-edge rules was done in order to test the validity of the rules.
However, I never see that there is a mecanism that allow to collect experiences with bleeding-edge rules.
I give an example: Monday, a infected computer has been plugged on the internal network I am managing. This computer has initiating an IRC connection and receive instructions. A dozen computers are then infected with an unknow virus exploiting the Lsa vulnerability. Some rules have been usefull in such circonstances : the rules on LSA, the rules on IRC communication on non standard port, and RXBOT rules.
Thierry
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] reporting false positives..., Matthew Watchinski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Rules utilisation, Matt Jonkman |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-sigs] Broken thresholding in 2923.1 and 2924.1?, nnposter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Rules utilisation, Matt Jonkman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |