Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Snort-Signatures
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Snort-sigs] reporting false positives...

Subject: Re: [Snort-sigs] reporting false positives...
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:09:18 -0400
Yup that order is pretty much on the money, also make sure you include the rule SID and REV, and make sure your HOME_NET and EXTERNAL_NET variables aren't set to "any". In some cases it also doesn't hurt to include the version of snort your running.

As for when to resort to getting full dumps, if you can't do it all the time, is when the protocol has extra context in the stream. Good examples of this are DCERPC and SMB, as packets sent previously in the stream influence what things mean latter on in the stream.

Cheers,
-matt

Russell Fulton wrote:

Thanks Matt & Janson for responses:  This has confirmed what I had
thought. Methods of reporting by order of usefulness:

1/ tcpdump of whole session
2/ tcpdump of single packet
3/ Ascii/hex dump of packet from Acid/or whatever.

Is there much difference between 2 and 3? Given that 3 is much easier to
obtain.

When should I resort to getting full dumps of the streams?

I have reported FPs on many occasions before (although not lately) and
never had any feed back.  I appreciate that folk are busy doing
productive stuff but I have been left wondering if it is worth my time
and if I am sending in the "right stuff".

I'd be happy if I got an occasional "Thanks, this is useful" or "Thanks,
but what I really need....".


Cheers, Russell






------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>