Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Snort-Signatures
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Snort-sigs] Thresholds on Policy Rules

Subject: Re: [Snort-sigs] Thresholds on Policy Rules
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:36:43 -0500
Jason wrote:
My $.02

If you threshold the rules effectively suppressing until you get multiple fires do you present evasion cases?

Yes, it's possible. I've seen few cases where a single web page full or porn doesn't hit 3 or 4 times though, so the odds of hitting the threshold are pretty good on bad traffic, and lower for legit traffic. But you make a good point.



Will it really solve the problem? A website about the state of Virginia is sure to fire even with threshold rules. What about virgin air?


Yes, that is true, and those are the falses I hope to eliminate. I am tired of reading alerts about virginia, and stuff from WebMD. :) I would hope that this will slow those down, but they'll not eliminate it completely.

If you threshold to suppress after a number if hits for a period of time do you create evasion cases? Hmmmm. I will browse to a Virginia site first then go to virgin airways then go look at porn.


If you're really aware of and understand IDS, and know these rules are running on your net, you'll realize this is easy to circumvent. Surf through an ssl tunnel to an anonymizer, find sites with images only, or bring in your own on a usb drive. :) There are many many ways around all of these. The only people these catch are the really dumb ones. (No offense intended if you have been caught :) ). If you're in an environment where that's against policy and you do it anyway then you're not likely the brightest bulb. Those would be the targets for these rules.


It seems inappropriate to threshold the rules since the acceptable level of alerts and potential false positive and negative are a decision for the administrator. I personally have come to believe that there should be no official porn rules and they should me made a contrib at most.


There's value to that argument, but I disagree. I think the official rules should have the basic rules for all categories. The local admin should be making the choice to disable what they don't care about, rather than have to read every rule to turn on what they want. Far fewer opportunities for mistakes when you're turning off rather than turning on.


Can you elaborate on why you think the porn rules should be off by default?

Matt


------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>