Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Snort-Signatures
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

[Snort-sigs] False positive for rule 1:1365

from [Worthy] Network Security [Permanent Link]
Subject: [Snort-sigs] False positive for rule 1:1365
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:53:38 +0200 
Hello,

  I found false positive for rule 1:1365
  it looks like this:

  GET /pphlogger.php?id=[id]&referer=http%3A//www.domain.com.pl/%3F6%26
  &r=1024x768&c=32&showme=n&st=js&title=Dystrybucja%20maszyn%20rolniczych
  %20firm%20McCormick%2C%20Laverda%2C%20Kverneland%2C%20Manitou%20i%20 HTTP/1.1

  this innocent request contain string rm%20

  can rule may be changed to avoid such false positives?
  or the only solution is to remove that rule?

-- 
Best regards,
 Worthy                    mailto: listy@home.olsztyn.pl




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
[More with this subject...]




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [Snort-sigs] Bleedingsnort.com Daily Update, matt
Next by Date:  RE: [Snort-sigs] False positive for rule 1:1365, Truax, Shawn (MBS)
Previous by Thread:  [Snort-sigs] snort-rules update @ Wed Sep 22 10:15:46 2004, bmc
Next by Thread:  Re: [Snort-sigs] False positive for rule 1:1365, Mike Pomraning
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]