Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-sigs] JPEG / GDI+ DLL exploit sig? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:06:12 -0500 |
The problem is that there is no guaranteed offset, the COM(comment) section can be right after SOI (start of image) or after the JFIF marker, if there is one, etc... And the JFIF marker itself can be 65535 bytes in length. I wrote one that looks for the SOI, COM and Huffman table start and I still get lots of false positives, I have yet to find a good way to eliminate false positives. There is alot of flexibility in the formatting of a jpeg and that makes this difficult. On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:57:22 +0100, Chas Tomlin <cet@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi, I'm using these rules to spot malicious jpegs. alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS -> $HOME_NET any (msg:"WEB-CLIENT jpeg vulnerability"; flow:to_client,established; content:"Content-Type\: image/jpeg"; content:"|FF FE 00 00|"; classtype:attempted-user; sid:3000363; rev:10;) alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET $HTTP_PORTS -> $HOME_NET any (msg:"WEB-CLIENT jpeg vulnerability"; flow:to_client,established; content:"Content-Type\: image/jpeg"; content:"|FF FE 00 01|"; classtype:attempted-user; sid:3000363; rev:10;) So far I haven't seen any, just a few false positives. I think the rules could be improved by specifying an offset for the COM length (00 0)/00 01). Chas -----Original Message----- From: snort-sigs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:snort-sigs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Frank Knobbe Sent: 20 September 2004 18:07 To: snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Snort-sigs] JPEG / GDI+ DLL exploit sig? Greetings, it seems there are now three Proof-of-Concept exploits out for the JPEG handling issue in the GDI+ DLL (MS04-028). Does anyone have a signature for this yet? Preferable on the problem (like the libpng issue) and not just pattern match on the exploits. Cheers, Frank ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Snort-sigs] JPEG / GDI+ DLL exploit sig?, Frank Knobbe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] PCRE for SS#'s, Matt Jonkman |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Snort-sigs] JPEG / GDI+ DLL exploit sig?, Frank Knobbe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] JPEG / GDI+ DLL exploit sig?, Mailing Lists |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |