Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Snort-Signatures
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Snort-sigs] typot false positives?

Subject: Re: [Snort-sigs] typot false positives?
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 10:27:18 -0600
I also get a few alerts for sid 2182, I dismissed them as the targets are
not linux. However, are people with false positives noticing similar
source/dest ports among alerts?  Unless there is some correlation between
tcp windowsize and port numbers, I hesitate to call mine false-positive.

-peter

rule:
alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET any (msg:"BACKDOOR typot trojan
traffic"; flags:S,12; window:55808; flow:stateless;
classtype:trojan-activity; reference:mcafee,100406; sid:2182; rev:7;)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Nagro" <john.nagro@gmail.com>
To: "Joerg Weber" <j.weber@infos.de>
Cc: <snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Snort-sigs] typot false positives?


Yeah, i have seen a lot of this traffic, and i doubt its virii... we
should figure out how to fix this rule

-John


On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 13:40:46 +0200, Joerg Weber <j.weber@infos.de> wrote:
Hello list,

does anyone else experience apparently false positives with sid 2182?

alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET any (msg:"BACKDOOR typot trojan
traffic"; flags:S,12; window:55808; flow:stateless;
classtype:trojan-activity; reference:mcafee,100406; sid:2182; rev:7;)

I have quite a few alarms but from all I can tell these are false
positives (ie. traffic to non-existing hosts, as the rule is stateless
this might not stop it from firing).

Anyone else?

Cheers,

Joerg

--
Joerg Weber M. A.
Network Security

infoServe GmbH
Nell-Breuning-Allee 6
D-66115 Saarbruecken

T: (0681) 8 80 08 - 59
F: (0681) 8 80 08 - 33
www.infos.de
E: j.weber@infos.de







-- 
John Nagro
john.nagro@gmail.com


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. 
Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>