Re: [Snort-sigs] secure connection to bleedingsnort.com

Awesome, thanks a bunch!

if i may make a suggestion, take a look at cacert.org

-John

On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:33:44 -0500, Matt Jonkman <mjonkman@infotex.com> wrote:
> That's a good idea. We didn't originally because the only cert
> immediately available is a wildcard for  *.infotex.com. The project is
> on one of our servers, but the effort is certainly community-wide, so we
> didn't feel that appropriate.
>
> However, we could just put the cert on snort.infotex.com and people
> could just use that for rule downloads. That way there won't be script
> issues with mis-matched certs.
>
> Or if anyone has the resources to donate a cert for bleedingsnort.com
> we'd be more than happy to use it. :)
>
> I'll go ahead and do the infotex cert though, if there aren't any
> objections.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> John Nagro wrote:
>
> > This is just a thought, but it would be nice to have https access to
> > bleedingsnort.com as to prevent legit rule-file download from setting
> > off snort alerts. Doesnt have to be a real cert, could be self-signed
> > or better yet cacert.org offers free ones.
> >
> > thoughts? ideas?
> >
> > -John


-- 
John Nagro
john.nagro@gmail.com


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs