Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Help on an ICMP rule: sid 486 |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:56:12 -0700 (PDT) |
Well i still would like to see if this alert started firing off on something new (ie. anything except between my sensors and my vpn pool). So this is a perfect case FOR a pass rule for me. Correct? Thanks for the -o insight. Does this mean that anyone using pass rules should use the -o? If not, could you explain to me a case where a pass rule would be useful in the default order of alert -> pass -> log? -Seth --- Alex Kirk <alex.kirk@sourcefire.com> wrote:
Seth, That's because of the way Snort configures its order of alerting, and the fact that your alert rule is still in there. By default, Snort processes alert rules, then pass rules, then log rules; if you use the -o flag, they'll process as pass, alert, and then log. Of course, it'd be equally easy to just comment out the offending alert rule and not fiddle with a pass rule...it's up to you how you want to do it. Alex Kirk Research Analyst Sourcefire, Inc.Thanks so much alex. The host firewall on the sensors. That makes perfect sence. Now a question about my pass rule. It doesnt seemtobe working. This is my first attempt at a passruleand ive studied other pass rules that I have foundinthe archives but nothing is working. In snort.conf i made to var's var SNORT_SENSORS [192.168.200.100,192.200.101] var VPN_POOL 192.168.216.0/24 then added my pass rule to local.rules: pass icmp $SNORT_SENSORS any -> $VPN_POOL (msg: "Ignore ICMP dest. Admin. Prohib"; icode:10;itype:3;sid:999901; rev:1;) I have tried it with any any -> any any, and alsowithno sid or rev because i have seen some pass rules without them in the archives. Snort always loadsbackup after the restart but I still get the alerts.Whatam I missing. Thanks again, Seth --- Alex Kirk <alex.kirk@sourcefire.com> wrote:Seth, You are correct in that your variables aren'treallyrelevant to this alert. This alert's message is actually taken from the actual error type/codes that go along with ICMP itself; I strongly suspect that, if the wording isn't straight from the RFC itself, it's from page 71 of Steven's TCP/IP Illustrated Volume 1 (which is what I used to just check myself with -- great book for anyone interested in networking).Allit means is that there's some sort of policy/firewall/routing setup/whatever on the subnet/IPs that the messages are dealing with that blocks pings. Considering that it's your Snort sensor and yourVPNpool interacting, my guess is that you've either got a tightly configured firewall on your Snort box (which would of course make sense), or that your VPN software is sending these messages back. They're nothing to worry about, I'd definitely go with a pass rule. Alex Kirk Research Analyst Sourcefire, Inc.Hello all. Quick question. I get a couple of thousand "ICMP Destination UnreachableCommunicationwith Destination Host is AdministrativelyProhibited"alerts a day. The source addr's are always the LAN cards on mysnortsensors and the destination addr's are only IPsfromour VPN pool. Before I write a pass rule I was just wonderingifsomeone has any insight on why I am getting thealertsand what they mean? The rule is an any any -> any any. icode:10;itype:3;so i don't think it has to do with me fine tuningthevariables more ... right? It's only the one sensor that is monitoring thelanside of the firewall that picks up the rules upeventho the sources are coming from all thee linuxbox's(snort database, DMZ sensor and LAN sensor. Thanks, Seth __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail-------------------------------------------------------SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowestprice on Blank Media100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk SonicDVD+R for only $33Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - FreeShippingand Free Gift.http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285_______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs-------------------------------------------------------SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk SonicDVD+Rfor only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285_______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs===== REPLY TO: adidas3@optonline.net _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enternow.http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush
=====
REPLY TO: adidas3@optonline.net
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Help on an ICMP rule: sid 486, Alex Kirk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Help on an ICMP rule: sid 486, Alex Kirk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Help on an ICMP rule: sid 486, Alex Kirk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Help on an ICMP rule: sid 486, Alex Kirk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |