Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Re: [Snort-sigs] 2383 FP " NETBIOS SMB-DS DCERPC NTLMSSP asn1 overflow attempt" |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:59:22 -0400 |
I understand that my report is pretty useless without corraborating information, but in the interest of security I chose not to distribute the pcaps to the list, since they contain my IPs and other identifying information. I did say that I'll be more than happy to provide the pcaps to the snort team, but I didn't want to just fire off the email to you guys (snort/sourcefire), and bypass the list. I'll send the pcap to you directly. I believe it's a false positive because it does not look like an attack. It's coming from a desktop, directed to a server (actually two different servers), but the timing is not consistent with an attack, rather with normal MS communication. It's all some fuzzy logic in my head, call it my gut feeling, but I am pretty sure it's not an attack, and therefore a False Positive. On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:52:43 -0400, Alex Kirk <alex.kirk@sourcefire.com> wrote:
Generally speaking, it's nice if you can provide details with a false positive report -- like why you think it's a false positive, what (if anything) you suspect may be causing it, and pcaps if appropriate. We're more than happy to investigate these things, but just saying there's a false positive associated with a rule gives us nowhere to even begin. BTW, please send whatever details you may have to the list, so that more eyes can be looking at them. Alex Kirk Research Analyst Sourcefire, Inc.I am using the newest 2.2 ruleset (as of yesterday) and seeing a fair number of false positives on sid 2383 "NETBIOS SMB-DS DCERPC NTLMSSP asn1 overflow attempt" Anyone else? I can provide pcaps to the snort/sourcefire team if need be.
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] 2383 FP " NETBIOS SMB-DS DCERPC NTLMSSP asn1 overflow attempt", Alex Kirk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] 2383 FP " NETBIOS SMB-DS DCERPC NTLMSSP asn1 overflow attempt", Alex Kirk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] 2383 FP " NETBIOS SMB-DS DCERPC NTLMSSP asn1 overflow attempt", Alex Kirk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] 2383 FP " NETBIOS SMB-DS DCERPC NTLMSSP asn1 overflow attempt", Alex Kirk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |