Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Snort-sigs] Possible False Positive on SID 2383 |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:52:50 -0500 |
I've just upgrade to Snort 2.2.0 from 2.1.3, using the rules that came with the 2.2.0 tarball, I notice what appears to be false positives on SID 2383. From as far as I can tell it's normal traffic from either Windows 2000 pro workstations, Windows XP pro workstations communicating to a Windows 2003 domain controller. I have a capture of the traffic available for analysis. Lance
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Snort-sigs] Rule 466 False-Positives, John B. |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Possible False Positive on SID 2383, Nigel Houghton |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-sigs] Rule 466 False-Positives, John B. |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-sigs] Possible False Positive on SID 2383, Nigel Houghton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |