Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Proximity of DR Sites & U.S. City Hazards |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 03 Mar 2006 08:50:27 -0600 |
Do you know of a standard that defines the distance between a business and its DR site? From what I recall, the minimum distance should be 50/200 miles, not accounting for hazards.
I have already checked ISO 17799 and thought this might be an easy answer for those of you dedicated to DR/BCP.
I am also looking for a definitive resource that lists hazards in major U.S. cities (e.g. fault lines, hurricane zones, etc.).
Here are some resources for you:
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/chrr/resources/ http://www.ncddc.noaa.gov/cra/coastalresources/document_view http://archone.tamu.edu/hrrc/research/reslinks.shtml http://www.disasternews.net/links.php http://nationalmap.gov/ http://www.usgs.gov/ http://www.epa.gov/
I'm sure you can Google for much more. There are lots of online maps, and plenty of GIS tools available to roll your own.
Personally, I'm not much for "committee" solutions, in that whatever a body of "experts" publishes, I prefer to evaluate the data myself. For example, even 200 miles isn't going to be enough separation for a severe winter storm, major floods, or hurricanes.
Some common sense things:
In "tornado alley" you don't want to locate on common "weather tracks"; meaning on a line from southwest to the northeast, which is the common direction of travel of severe weather. This also works for winter storms and flooding as well.
Other major factors are power grids and internet pipelines.
My personal opinion is that the more telecommuter friendly an organization is, the easier it is to mitigate the effects of a disaster.
Good luck.
Mark Stingley
-- Excellence in InfoSec and Linux http://www.altsec.info
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: security information management and event management evaluation, David Lawson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Security Dashboard, Thornton Daniel R CONT NPRI |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Proximity of DR Sites & U.S. City Hazards, Fred Cohen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Proximity of DR Sites & U.S. City Hazards, Jonathan . Bloomquist |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |