Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Process Improvement for Security |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:29:25 -0500 |
How does Octvae support or divert from COBIT? Best Regards, Joe Rezendes Security Compliance Officer Global Information Security Franklin Templeton Investments Office: 727-299-4376 Cell: 813-924-6537 Fax: 727-299-3437 Mail Station: 140-3 Email: jrezend@templeton.com
This message may contain information that is legally privileged or confidential. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply email, and delete the message and any attachments. This transmission is believed to be defect free; however, no responsibility is accepted by the sender for damage arising from its receipt.
-----Original Message----- From: Brad Bemis [mailto:bradleyb@bradleyb.net] Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 11:04 AM To: 'Mcanyana, Wandile'; 'Mark Curphey'; thomas.jones@hushmail.com; psrc@securityfocus.com; security-management@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Process Improvement for Security We are using OCTAVE as our internal risk assessment method (step 1 starts next week). The catalog of practices is a useful tool, but as with most of the best practices out there, it needs to be supplemented by some of the other models, and consideration needs to be given for any unique situations or controls that exist within your enterprise. Of course, the OCTAVE method is freely available, so that may make a difference for those who are dealing with significant budget constraints. -Brad Bemis, CISSP, CISA -----Original Message----- From: Mcanyana, Wandile [mailto:Wandile.Mcanyana@firstrandbank.co.za] Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 10:36 PM To: Mark Curphey; Brad Bemis; thomas.jones@hushmail.com; psrc@securityfocus.com; security-management@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Process Improvement for Security Mark et al The OCTAVE methodology has a set of processes/practices that they suggest for use. Attached is the document with the suggested processes/practices. Wandile -----Original Message----- From: Mark Curphey [mailto:mark@curphey.com] Sent: 09 February 2006 08:44 AM To: 'Brad Bemis'; thomas.jones@hushmail.com; psrc@securityfocus.com; security-management@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Process Improvement for Security Brad Interesting links, thanks. In my experience very few corporate security functions have even defined what their processes are in a way that then can be measured with any scheme like Six Sigma or otherwise so while an interesting idea proposed it seems the first step is to document / diagram the various processes. I would be interested if anyone has a good list of the core processes they think are needed in a commercial sec dept such as vuln management, continuity planning, risk assessment, security monitoring etc? Maybe ISO17799 is sufficient (I don't think so but) ...... -----Original Message----- From: Brad Bemis [mailto:bradleyb@bradleyb.net] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 9:07 PM To: thomas.jones@hushmail.com; psrc@securityfocus.com; security-management@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Process Improvement for Security I just went through a week long Greenbelt training class on Lean Six-Sigma. I can see some real potential in the process improvements steps, and since my organization is adopting Lean Six-Sigma as its primary process improvement/quality management model, it can also function as a common language between IT and the Business. It isn't really anything new beyond general TQM, good business practices, and the like, but it does do a good job of encapsulating everything. The measurements, metrics, and ability to represent data in charts, graphs, and more are really quite impressive. In terms of usefulness, I am still somewhat unconvinced that it is a 'silver bullet' solution - everything comes down to having good data - meaningful data that can be used to serve a purpose. The metrics and measurements for information security have certainly come a long way over the last few years, but a lot of the people and process-oriented aspects of a security program (often the ones that have the most significant impact) can be somewhat difficult to measure in a meaningful way. A local company has been doing presentations on 'Security Kaizen' that have also been pretty interesting - a quick google search should get you pointed in the right direction. It provides some interesting ideas on metrics, measurements, process improvement, and security program development. Used in conjunction with the NIST Pub on security metrics for technology systems, and a few other odds and ends (like COBIT, ITIL, CMMI, ISO 17799, and the FFIEC IT Examiners Handbook to name a few) you can probably put together a very nice data collection method. I've also come across a few pretty good articles during my own google searching.
-----Original Message----- From: thomas.jones@hushmail.com [mailto:thomas.jones@hushmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 10:58 AM To: psrc@securityfocus.com Subject: Process Improvement for Security In line with my last post can anyone point me to a resource or does anyone have any opinions on applying Six Sigma, balanced scorecards
or
other business process techniques to information security ? Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no
account
required http://www.hushmail.com/send?lH0 Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail https://www.hushssl.com?lH5
______________________________________________________________________ _____________________________ The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may contain proprietary information. It is meant solely for the intended recipient. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted in reliance on this, is prohibited and may be unlawful .No liability or responsibility is accepted if information or data is, for whatever reason corrupted or does not reach its intended recipient. No warranty is given that this e-mail is free of viruses. The views expressed in this e-mail are, unless otherwise stated, those of the author and not those of FirstRand Bank Limited or its management. FirstRand Bank Limited reserves the right to monitor, intercept and block e-mails addressed to its users or take any other action in accordance with its e-mail use policy. Licensed divisions of FirstRand Bank Limited are authorised financial service providers in terms of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act 37 of 2002. ______________________________________________________________________ _____________________________ Notice: All email and instant messages (including attachments) sent to or from Franklin Templeton Investments (FTI) personnel may be retained, monitored and/or reviewed by FTI and its agents, or authorized law enforcement personnel, without further notice or consent.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Antivirus Audit Methodology, Walczak Pawel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Process Improvement for Security, Kim Sassaman |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Process Improvement for Security, Brad Bemis |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Process Improvement for Security, Kim Sassaman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |