Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Security-Management
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Cobit question

Subject: Re: Cobit question
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 18:29:17 +0530
On 29/01/06 22:54 +0100, Rafael San Miguel Carrasco wrote:

I am reading Cobit 4.0 and I have found something confusing in process 
"PO3 Determine Technological Direction".
The section "and is measured by" says "Number of technology platforms by 
function across the enterprise".

In your opinion, is a higher number of platforms a good or a bad sypthom?
Fewer platforms makes the envronment more manageable, reduces TCO and 
maintenance costs.
More platforms means that exhaustive use of IT is being done, automating 
most functions within the organization.

More platforms certainly does not mean that exhaustive use of IT is being
done. It means that you have redundancy, which may be a good or bad
thing. 

With different operating systems, you get a more heterogenous network, 
which should be more resistant to security breaches. However,
the cost of managing these systems increases.

If you are using Lotus Notes, Groupwise and Exchange for groupware, you
have three different platforms. Notes on AS400, Notes on AIX and Notes
on Win32 would make for three different platforms as well.

Deciding which works for you would be a financial decision. 

Devdas Bhagat

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>