Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | How to organize a lot of policies? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:05:24 -0500 |
Hello, I am currently working on rewriting / re-working security policies and there are a *lot* of policies. I'm thinking it's probably not a good idea to have users sign them all (especialy if they don't apply to them). What I would like to do is structure them in an easy to organize/update scheme. I have a couple of strategies in mind and would appreciate some input. 1. Have a mother-security policiy which will basically say "be nice", then point to other specific policies (email use, VPN use, developper's code of conduit, etc.) for more specific details. This approach is really a "company wide" approach where 1 signature means the user agrees to all the policies in place. It's easy but there is no or very low customization possible. 2. Have a fair usage policies that is wider than the one above and ask the user's supervisor to make sure the users signs the right ones. I guess this could be seen as a role-based. If a user is a developper, he would have to sign X number of policies that would apply to him. I think this is hard to track. One of the major goal is to be able to have specific policies/standards/procedures that are easily understandable by the common user and not just a "sign here" type of document. By focusing on the role of the user, I hope he/she will take the time to read what applies to himself. Any thoughts? Thanks! (N)
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Newest edition of ISO 17799, Mike Gillespie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | BCP for Avian Flu Pandemic, Brad Bemis |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Newest edition of ISO 17799, Mike Gillespie |
| Next by Thread: | RE: How to organize a lot of policies?, Benjamin Tomhave |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |