Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Security-Management
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Performance monitoring of colocation vendors

Subject: Re: Performance monitoring of colocation vendors
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 06:10:44 -0800
I hate to say it but the ITIL is more or less designed to address this issue. They basically say that you follow ISO17799, which is pretty reasonable. My view is somewhat more radical. I figure outsourced or not the same security requirements apply. The problem is that you can't get as good a set of feedback from them because you don't own the management. Some use independent audits such as SAS-70 for financial institutions as the means for review, but this is problematic for those who don't do it.

On Nov 30, 2005, at 2:42 PM, Dora Mandadjiev wrote:

Hello,

If a company uses a co-location facility for housing its IT infrastructure:

1. What are things that are appropriate and necessary to review/ audit the service provider for on a regular basis (e.g., annually)? Does anyone know of a good checklist or an audit program for such review?

The same thing you would review if it were not outsourced.

Is it appropriate to ask the vendor to provide for review internal policies and procedures for equipment maintenance, incident handling, physical access, etc?
Not only appropriate but absolutely necessary.
How should I handle situations when the colocation provider with whom our company has a colocation contract has outsourced the facilities management to another company and says that the maintenance P&Ps are part of the contract b/w the outsourced vendor and them and are confidential?
Fire the vendor and explain that the need to fulfill legal and regulatory requirements is absolutely necessary and their confidentiality is less important then you keeping your CEO out of jail.
What is an appropriate way to leverage SAS70 reviews on the vendor?
Whatever they cover you should use, however, this is not adequate from a controls point of view in my view.

2. What are appropriate metrics to use to "monitor" the performance of the service provider (if they are providing facility and internet connectivity)?
Business metrics - always. I have a book called "Security Metrics" that provides a whole set of metrics that go with the governance structures described in "the Governance Guidebook". But which ones are good for you requires customization to the model you use and your specific needs.
Up-time, power outages, environmental parameters, incidents, etc.
Sure - these are 4 out of 4,000 you likely should choose from. The question drives back to the fundamental question of how your business depends on them.

Thanks!


-- This communication is confidential to the parties it is intended to serve --
Security Posture securityposture.com tel/fax
University of New Haven unhca.com 925-454-0171
Fred Cohen & Associates all.net 572 Leona Drive
Security Management Partners policygeeks.com Livermore, CA 94550


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>