Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: IT Department Size |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 1 Nov 2005 08:41:22 +0200 |
Hi to all, I do not agree with this approach. All is the good planning and balanced budgeting, to meet company's objectives. Thank you. Tritsaris Costas. Athens -----Original Message----- From: ilaiy [mailto:ilaiy.e@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 4:02 PM To: Rami.Prescott@frostbank.com Cc: security-management@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: IT Department Size I am guess it would be 1 windows and 1 Linux Administrator for every 100 users ... That would be a better choice .. ./thanks ilaiy On 10/25/05, Rami.Prescott@frostbank.com <Rami.Prescott@frostbank.com> wrote:
Would anyone know of a good place to find information on how large a system administrator/ network engineering department should be? The general rule of thumb I've heard is 1 system administrator/network engineer for every 250 users. Is this generally true in practice? We define system administrator/network engineer as someone who has 5-10 years experience in all OS and who is responsible for the operating system and hardware. Thank you, Rami Prescott IT Audit
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ????????????-?????? ???? ???? ?????????? ?? ??????????? ????? ??? ????????? ??? ??? ????? ?????????? ?? ???? ??????? ????? ???????????? ??? ????????. ?? ?????????, ??? ????????? ?? ??? ??? ????? ????? ?? ????? ? ??????????? ?????????? (? ??????? ???????? ?? ?? ????????? ?? ?????), ??????????? ?? ?? ?????????? ????? ??? ?? ??????? ??? ??? ?? ???????????? ??? ?????????. ? ?????????, ????? ? ??????????? ?? ??????? ??? ????????? ????? ??? ?? ?????????????? ????????? ?????????? ??? ????. ????????? ??? ?? ???????????? ???? ??? ?????????? (INTERNET) ??? ????? ????????, ? NovaBank ??? ????????? ??? ??????????? ??????? ????????? ? ???? ????? ??? ????????? ? ?????? ?????????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ?? ????????????? ?????????, ????????, ???????? ? ??????? ?? ???? ??? ???????? ?????????. ???? ????????? ??????????? ???????????? ? ?????? ??? ????????? ??? ?????????? ??? ??? ???? ??? ??? ??????????? ??? ???????????? ??? ????????. ?? ??????????? ??? ????????? ????? ???????? ?????????? ??????? ??? ???????? ???. ? NovaBank ??? ???????????, ???? ????????? ??? ??????????? ?????, ????????, ??????????, ????????, ??????? ? ???????? ? ???? ?????????? ??? ?????????? ?? ???? ?? ??????. DISCLAIMER This message and/or its attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is intended for the named person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient(s) you should not copy it, re-transmit it, use it or disclose its contents, but should return it to the sender and delete the copy from your system. The INTERNET is not a secure environment and NovaBank cannot accept any responsibility for the accurancy or completeness of this message nor any liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of this message or from delayed, intercepted, corrupted or virus-infected e-mail transmission. Contents of this message contain personal opinions of the sender. NovaBank is not responsible for, nor endorses any opinion, recommendation, conclusion, solicitation, offer or agreement or any information in this message. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: bank audit pen test, Richard . Sullivan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bank audit pen test, Louie |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: IT Department Size, Mark Brunner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Guidelines For System Administrators?, Lim Kah Wee |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |