Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Identification of non Cisco AP's |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:02:37 -0700 (PDT) |
No, I plan on running Nmap also, I should have stated that. Jonathan --- Todd Towles <toddtowles@brookshires.com> wrote:
You don't like simple Nmap with the -sV on?-----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Gauntt [mailto:jon0966@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 12:35 AM To: 'Ian Gorrie' Cc: security-management@securityfocus.com;pen-test@securityfocus.comSubject: RE: Identification of non Cisco AP's Thanks for the advice. If Superscan doesn't workout I willget a quote from Lumeta. Jonathan -----Original Message----- From: Ian Gorrie [mailto:iag@locked.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 2:40 AM To: Jonathan Gauntt Cc: security-management@securityfocus.com;pen-test@securityfocus.comSubject: Re: Identification of non Cisco AP's On the wire detection is shoddy at best. Usuallycommercialscanners will only detect default configurations. that being said, most products that I've looked at(such asLumeta IPSonar for instance) work by scanning forbanners onwebservers that are running on the APs. If youuse a productthat scans 80 and 443 for banners that match anAPs, youmight get somewhere. Not running an obvious banner, disabled, or notmatching a signature?You'll be out of luck unless you are tricky andcan somehowdetermine that it is a packet forwarding device. 802.11x on the network doesn't sound like such abad ideanow, does it? :) -i Jonathan Gauntt wrote:Hi, I have been tasked with the project of scanningand identifying allnon Cisco wireless access points within thecompany's network.We have about 800 /22 and /24 subnets, andbecause of the IPaddressing scheme in place, might just be easierfor me to scan thewhole class A range of IP's. I have access to Nessus and GFI SecurityScanner. Since weover 8000IP's in place, does anyone have any advice onthe best wayto identifythese non Cisco AP's such as Linksys andNetgear, etc.I wouldn't want to have a report produced thatis two miles longunless absolutely necessary. Thanks, Jonathan
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Identification of non Cisco AP's, Sherwood R. Probeck |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Identification of non Cisco AP's, Todd Towles |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Identification of non Cisco AP's, Todd Towles |
| Next by Thread: | Respuesta: Identification of non Cisco AP's, Omar Herrera |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |