Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Risk Assessment Standards |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 6 Jun 2005 08:56:00 +0200 |
Hi all I have seen this discussion today and I have a question for all of you: What are the differences between CRAMM and OCTAVE? Is there any? Regards, Rafael de Dios Security Analyst Disclaimer This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Bardin [mailto:jsbardin@hotmail.com] Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 12:36 PM To: lightningstorm53@yahoo.com; altb@educationcentral.org; security-management@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Risk Assessment Standards OCTAVE follows ISO17799. Very detail oriented but will get the job done if you have the stamina to stay with it. I was licensed to both teach and deliver OCTAVE at one point but the $6k per year renewal fee didn't seem worth the support I received (or did not receive) from CMU. Cobra is a tool based on ISO17799. Riskwatch is another tool that has mutiple modules but is very detailed as well. Regards, Jeff From: Chris Raymond <lightningstorm53@yahoo.com> To: "Alt, Brandon C." <altb@educationcentral.org>,security-management@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Risk Assessment Standards Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 20:04:32 -0700 (PDT) IAM (InfoSec Assessment Methodology) This one has a good methogology, but has a limited depth in the assessment area. It is a good assessment methogodology overall. I've heard down side to Octave, but nothing about cobra. Chris Raymond Master of Information Assurance and Computer Security student --- "Alt, Brandon C." <altb@educationcentral.org> wrote:
I'm looking to find what standards are available for performing a security risk assessment. What's out there? I know of Cobra and Octave, but have never used them. Does anyone have any experience with these two? What other standards do other follow? Thanks. Brandon Alt Information Security Manager Technology Division Duval County Public Schools
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Information Risk Management PowerPoint Slides - Was 'RE: Information Risk Management', Aric Perminter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Risk Assessment Standards, Salaets, Steven |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Risk Assessment Standards, Mitchell Rowton |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Risk Assessment Standards, Salaets, Steven |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |