Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: diff btw BD 7799, ISF Security Standard, ITIL and others.. |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:52:27 -0500 |
I make extensive use of the ISF Standard of Good Practice (SoGP), which is excellent. I have found that the SoGP is a much more practical standard than the BS or ISO frameworks (which, technically are not 'standards'). The SoGP also has much more breadth and depth of practical information than the more 'academic' BS/ISO frameworks. The ISF Standard is also free, whereas the others are not. I also like ITIL; ISF and ITIL are quite complementary, actually. Both strongly enforce business ownership of information and risk. Both are very practical. ITIL addresses service excellence through IT operations, with security elements present for operations management. ISF focuses on the status of controls across multiple areas driving by business risk analysis and best practices. The ISF is about to release its 2005 updated edition of the Standard of Good Practice; I'd encourage you to wait a few weeks for that release in order to get the most up-to-date information. Of course, actually joining the ISF as a full Member brings a wealth of additional advantages. I get great value from their research reports, workshops, conferences, and other resources. It's a terrific value for the money. -- Alan "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: diff btw BD 7799, ISF Security Standard, ITIL and others.., Matthew Caston |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: diff btw BD 7799, ISF Security Standard, ITIL and others.., dave kleiman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: diff btw BD 7799, ISF Security Standard, ITIL and others.., Matthew Caston |
| Next by Thread: | RE: diff btw BD 7799, ISF Security Standard, ITIL and others.., Martin Dion |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |