Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Email Retention Policy |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:44:35 -0600 |
I think David makes some excellent points. Bottom line is the retention is only part of the broader 'records management' process, which includes identification, categorization and classification of records. Legal and functional reps should all be involved in the process. Once in place, these things will help drive how long records are kept. In my opinion (which is reinforced by the opinion of our legal department), an e-mail copy of something should never be kept longer than you'd keep a paper copy of a document. Just because you can save a digital copy of something in a small space and tuck it away doesn't mean you should. Any information you do keep could be discoverable in a legal matter and may cost your company not only the legal penalties, but the time and effort it takes to retrieve the information. John Kuisle IS Supervisor - Security and Business Recovery Federated Mutual Insurance 507-455-5477 -----Original Message----- From: levenick@sympatico.ca [mailto:levenick@sympatico.ca] Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 1:04 PM To: security-management@securityfocus.com Cc: Robert.Mezzone@PJSolomon.Com Subject: Email Retention Policy Before one can really decide how long records must be kept one should look at defining the different type of documents there are. In my realm (Govt) we define documents to include but not just limited to email as: a. Transitory Records - is a record that is required only for a limited time to ensure the completion of a routine action or the preparation of a subsequent record. A transitory record is not a corporate record. Examples of transitory records include: · Information in a form used for casual communication; · Copies used for convenience only; and · Working drafts of letters, reports, and memos used for personal reference (i.e., not communicated beyond the individual who created them); and b. Corporate Record - is recorded information, regardless of physical form, that is created, collected or received in the initiation, conduct, control or completion of a business or operational activity. A corporate record includes sufficient content, context and structure to provide evidence of a business or operational activity. Corporate records are used to commit the resources of an organization, give direction or declare the position or opinion of an organization on any business subject or issue. Examples of corporate records would include: · Records used in decision-making; · Developing or implementing a policy, directive, or procedure; or · Carrying out government activities. If you would agree to the above then there would be no real requirement to keep transitory records for any longer than personal requirements. I would suggest that "Corporate documents" should be retained locally for at least a min of two years then further archived (central headquarters or archive dept) for at least 5 to ten years. With regard to "Corporate Record" I would suggest that retention alone is not sufficient. The "Corporate Record" should if in digital/electronic format, be digitally signed using an approved method. My environment uses the PKI/Entrust technologies to meet the mandate of digitally signing all corporate documents. David Levenick Information Systems Security Officer levenick@sympatico.ca
From: "Handy, Mark (IT)" <Mark.Handy@morganstanley.com>
Date: 2004/11/12 Fri PM 01:03:14 EST
To: <Robert.Mezzone@PJSolomon.Com>,
<security-management@securityfocus.com>
Subject: Re: Email Retention Policy
David Levenick This e-mail and its attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain privileged, confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, displaying, copying, or use of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please inform the sender immediately and delete and destroy any record of this message. Thank you.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Email Retention Policy, Pramote Sritanon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Designing a Security Operations Center Looking for Ideas -, Terry S |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Email Retention Policy, Pramote Sritanon |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Email Retention Policy, Robert Mezzone |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |