Additionally, after wiping the drive, you could use TrueCrypt to
encrypt it. (adding another layer of security)
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:20 PM, MaddHatter
<maddhatt+securitybasics@cat.pdx.edu> wrote:
"Worrell, Brian" <BWorrell_isdh.IN.gov> said (on 2008/04/23):
The DoD hard drive wipe seems to be okay (not perfect I know.) for
>removing sensitive data from a hard drive, but do you think it is
>acceptable for an SSD or other Flash based storage?
>
>If a DoD wipe is not good, what are your thoughts on something that is,
>or would work?
Your approach will depend on your level of paranoia. As usual, the
truly schizophrenic will only be happy with complete destruction (and
not entirely without good reason). Modern high density Flash devices
use wear-leveling. This means at any time the device could decide that
block A (a random chunk of memory, probably several megabits large)
is about to go belly-up, so it will move the data in block A to block Z
(and remap A->Z). It won't erase block A, just sort of forget that it
ever existed. You have no idea what potentially sensitive data was in
block A before it got decommissioned. A sufficiently knowledgeable and
determined attacker will be able to recover much of the data from block A,
even after the device has otherwise ceased to function.
An attacker might also be able to determine the relative stress seen
by each cell. Erasing (usually, changing to a 11 state) is a stressful
operation in Flash and causes measurable degradation. Cells that are
frequently erased will appear different than cells that have been erased
infrequently. Whether that's sensitive information depends on application
and on details of the device operation (which you have to assume the
attacker would know).
If you're not quite that worried, overwriting once with zeroes, then
ones, then zeroes is likely good enough. You could do ones, zeroes, ones
-- what's relevant is that every single cell has been set to both its
maximum and minimum state. Recovering any old data from the user-accessible
(i.e. not decommissioned) blocks at that point is highly improbable.
The variation in the state of the cells after such an operation is driven
by process variation and intrinsic effects that swamp whatever historical
state could plausibly remain.
