Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: FW: Mail relay question |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:34:22 +0100 |
On 2008-02-22 Nick Vaernhoej wrote:
After finding that my own mail setup at home has caught almost 5000 spam mails in less than a month I have finally thrown my hands in the air and wanted to hopefully get some understanding from this list.
Actually, the purpose of this list is not to teach you how e-mail works. Read RFC 821. Or at least the Wikipedia article on SMTP.
The amount alone is huge I think when I am only hosting my wife and myself (as well as the usual abuse etc. contacts). I am worried that my home is an open relay in a manner I have not found. Then I learn that via telnet I can send email from mydomain.com to mydomain.com and have it delivered even when the telnet session is from a public IP.
Can you send mail to arbitrary domains? Or just to your own domain?
So, I am a little fuzzy on what it is I am trying to learn here, but: 1. Would you think 5000 emails a month with maybe 200 valid emails is normal in a home/family type setup?
That depends on how your "home/family type setup" is actually set up. If the server does catchall I'd consider it pretty normal.
2. Is mail always accepted and relayed when the sender and recipient domain is the same? (This is without sender authentication configured or capability).
No. Usually mail servers only accept mail for their own domains. I would suspect that not even Exchange relays by default, but it's been quite a while since I had to deal with it, and it was Exchange 5.5. and 2000 at that time.
a. If yes, what is to stop an angry neighbor on his vacation to
China from sending a nasty email from me to my wife? (In this
unsecure setup).
That has nothing at all to do with relaying (assuming your wife's mailbox is hosted on your mail server). Addresses in the From field can be spoofed. Period. This is how SMTP is specified.
b. My gateway at home (Smoothwall using DSPAM/SEMF? mod) only
accepts the initial HELO if followed by connecting domain name
(HELO domain.com) So how come I can connect from domainx.com and
send email from domainy.com to domainy.com?
See above.
c. What can I do to remove this risk?
That someone sends mail with a spoofed From address to one of your mailboxes? Nothing at all.
3. Any recommendations on a free mail gateway solution? SpamAssassin? ClamAV? My goal is to migrate away from Exchange 2003. I have been wanting to try Zimbra for mail server but would like a good mail gateway in the DMZ instead of hosted by the firewall.
The mail component of Zimbra is basically Postfix with SpamAssassin and ClamAV. You can easily make that kind of setup on any Linux box without thw whole Zimbra overhead. If all you need is a mail server then I'd suggest to simply install Postfix. The documentation is pretty simple and well-documented. http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html Particularly interesting WRT spam protection: http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER_README.html http://www.postfix.org/uce.html
This electronic transmission is intended for the addressee (s) named above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copy, or dissemination of this transmission or the taking of any action in reliance on its contents, or other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender that this message was received in error and then delete this message.
You do realize that this kind of disclaimer is utterly pointless, don't you? Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- "All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches becoming available." --Jason Coombs on Bugtraq
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Two questions, Michael Condon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: FW: Mail relay question, Aaron Howell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Mail relay question, Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers |
| Next by Thread: | Re: FW: Mail relay question, Aaron Howell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |