Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Securing workstations from IT guys |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:25:20 -0600 |
The point you make I believe is shared by most(everyone?). What I am questioning is how is your evidence from a key logger preferred to an audit log entry saying John Doe accessed spreadsheet.xls from IP 312.423.534.534? With the audit log you can make your point. With a key log the offender can say he typed gibberish just to be a rebel. And you are back to basing a decision on opinion. Nick Vaernhoej "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." -----Original Message----- From: listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] On Behalf Of Vandenberg, Robert Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 11:02 AM To: security-basics Subject: RE: Securing workstations from IT guys Nice if the world could be that easy. But nowadays in our litigious society, not going through a through investigation before taking the appropriate actions is going to invite a wrongful termination lawsuit. It is better to have all of your ducks in line and get all of the evidence you can before you bring the offending party in and fire them. -----Original Message----- From: listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] On Behalf Of Eric Marden Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 1:02 PM To: security-basics Subject: Re: Securing workstations from IT guys But a keylogger seems more than lazy, in my opinion. If you can't trust the employees, then fire them. Eric Marden xentek: enlightened internet solutions http://xentek.net/ On Nov 28, 2007, at 4:06 PM, Big Joe Jenkins wrote:
No. Company property is exactly that- even more so if your HR/ infosec
folks are bright enough to force all employees to sign an acceptible use policy/statement of non-privacy stating such at their hire. On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Petter Bruland wrote:I think installing key logger software is stepping over the line. Although it's company assets, isn't there some sort of privacy law that makes this illegal? -Petter -----Original Message----- From: listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] On Behalf Of Nick Vaernhoej Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:41 PM To: security-basics Subject: RE: Securing workstations from IT guys A key logger? At what point are we crossing the line of common decency towards co-workers? I realize it is company property and all, but if you log access to sensitive files and audit these logs do you really need to be more intrusive? This is not an attack, more a tagged on question to everyone? Is keystroke logging commonly accepted by you? Nick Vaernhoej "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." -----Original Message----- From: listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] On Behalf Of Vandenberg, Robert Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 11:18 AM To: security-basics Subject: RE: Securing workstations from IT guys Those are good points. I would recommend that you put in a keystroke logger program with the
written approval of your upper management on the PCs in question and then download the logs each day. That way you are able to create a forensics "e-Trail" that can be used to confront/counsel/etc. them. I would also make sure that you look at your documenation and ensure that each IT person has signed a document stating that they will not use their abilities improperly. Combine those two and you have a means of pursuing them legally. This electronic transmission is intended for the addressee (s) named above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copy, or dissemination of this transmission or the taking
of any action in reliance on its contents, or other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender that this message was received in error and then delete this message. Thank you.
This electronic transmission is intended for the addressee (s) named above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copy, or dissemination of this transmission or the taking of any action in reliance on its contents, or other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender that this message was received in error and then delete this message. Thank you.
| Previous by Date: | RE: Securing workstations from IT guys, Craig Wright |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: FW: Securing workstations from IT guys, Craig Wright |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Securing workstations from IT guys, Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers |
| Next by Thread: | Removable media, Worrell, Brian |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |