Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: NAT external/Public IP |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:52:52 -0500 |
It doesn't tell you that you must use NAT. It tells you to properly secure your internal address space SUCH AS PAT or NAT. "1.5 Implement IP masquerading to prevent internal addresses from being translated and revealed on the internet. Use technologies that implement RFC 1918 address space, such as port address translation (PAT) or network address translation (NAT)." NAT doesn't make much of a difference in how secure a public IP is. As long as the host is properly secured it should be no different than hosting a DMZ. Nick Vaernhoej "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." -----Original Message----- From: listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] On Behalf Of Jason Alexander Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 10:28 AM To: security-basics@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: NAT external/Public IP If its not a security risk then why is it a PCI requirement? -----Original Message----- From: listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] On Behalf Of Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers Sent: 25 October 2007 15:49 To: security-basics@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: NAT external/Public IP On 2007-10-25 crazy frog crazy frog wrote:
On 24 Oct 2007 15:46:21 -0000, smarts_buy@yahoo.com wrote:Would like know is ther any security concern to bring in external/public IP with out NAT to inside of the enterprise network. Is it any way more secure if we use NAT?
[...]
2)If you allow lots of machine to direct access the internet with external ip they may pose a security risk.
How would that pose a risk that would not exist with NAT'ed machines? Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- "All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches becoming available." --Jason Coombs on Bugtraq This electronic transmission is intended for the addressee (s) named above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copy, or dissemination of this transmission or the taking of any action in reliance on its contents, or other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender that this message was received in error and then delete this message. Thank you.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: NAT external/Public IP, Chris Barber |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: LAN issue, Robert D. Holtz - Lists |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: NAT external/Public IP, Chris Barber |
| Next by Thread: | Re: NAT external/Public IP, Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |