Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: [SPAM] - Failover internet connections, and implementation... - Bayesian Filter detected spam |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:29:12 -0400 |
We use the Fatpipes mpvpn to load balance 3 internet connections coming on on different media (fiber, copper cable) They work great. Remember if you have an external services (mail, web, etc) you will need to address dns issues if you manual change isp's. The fatpipes cover this for you. Their support is great, we have been running 2 for redundancy for over 3 years now with no issues. http://www.fatpipeinc.com/mpvpn/index.html -----Original Message----- From: listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] On Behalf Of Dan Denton Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 2:19 PM To: security-basics@securityfocus.com Subject: [SPAM] - Failover internet connections, and implementation... - Bayesian Filter detected spam I've a question about failover internet connections. I'm interesting in knowing what kind of implementations that other SMB's use for redundancy, and to switch to in the case of a DOS attack. Do any of you have redundant highspeed internet connections for your offices (versus those for datacenters)? If so, what kind of setup do you have? Here's the setups I'm considering... 1. Have a second cable modem/dsl modem active, but not hooked into the network. In the event of a failure, move the connection for perimeter devices over to the standby connection and reconfigure the perimeter device to use a different IP. 2. Have a second set of perimeter devices (firewalls) programmed to use the IP's on the second connection, as a hot standby. My problem with the first option is the time it would take to reconfigure firewalls and IDS' to use the other ISP's connection. The problem I have with the second is the expense of firewalls and IDS' just sitting there idle. Any input is greatly appreciated! Dan
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Failover internet connections, and implementation..., Wilson Mosquera |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Event Log Monitor Program, Hopke, Greg |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Failover internet connections, and implementation..., Wilson Mosquera |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Failover internet connections, and implementation..., VM |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |